By publishing news that the appellant was removed from office and that the money from a cash-registry where he had worked went missing, no violation of the appellant’s right to private and family life could have occurred.
• Decision on Admissibility and Merits No. AP 1031/04 of 26 April 2005, paragraph 22, published in the Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 48/05
The Constitutional Court concludes that there is no violation of the appellant’s right to private life under Article II(3)(f) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Article 8 of the European Convention, when the interference with the private life was effected through the use of transcripts and records of the appellant’s intercepted telephone conversations, the reports of undercover investigators and telephone calls records which were found to be lawful evidence in terms of valid regulations, and they were necessary in a democratic society for the purpose of achieving the legitimate goal of preventing and detecting criminal offences and the protection of the rights of others, and that there is no violation of the appellant’s right to private life under Article II(3)(f) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Article 8 of the European Convention, given that the mentioned evidence did not relate to the appellant.
• Decision on Admissibility and Merits No. AP 1655/11 of 25 June 2014, paragraph 55, published in the Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 71/14; the lawfulness of evidence, criminal proceedings; there is no violation of Article 8 of the European Convention and Article II(3)(f) of the Constitution of BiH, and Article 6 of the European Convention and Article II(3)(e) of the Constitution of BiH
